I'm only a half way through Mind Wide Open, by Steven Johnson, but I'm already willing to recommend this book to all of my friends, and beyond that anyone who's day to day life involves relationships or critical thinking. In the first chapter, Johnson writes:
The more you understand the brain in light of modern science, the more you realize that the isolated traits you posess aren't really isolated — the brain is full of zero-sum games, where one talent prospers at the expense of another. Sometimes those balancing acts involve related skills; sometimes the connection is more obscure.
I think about this all the time. I spent many hours during the summer of '97 playing Quake. A few things happened as a result - one is that I became scared to turn sharp corners in real life without peeking ("lookahead" in Quake lingo) first, and sounds or visual patterns that were familiar in the game were slightly unsettling. To make matters worse, I was living in an huge off campus dorm straight out of a haunted house movie (indeed, we had Bats in the attic). I now know that this was a natural tension between my brain's amygdala and neocortex. Also that summer, I became a better programmer, forged strong friendships, and generally relaxed more than I have since.
So when the BBC reported that Taxi drivers in London have unusually large brains, I didn't doubt it for a second. Since then, I have been searching for a mental exercise routine to keep me fresh. Johnson visits a few companies developing "neurofeedback" video games to encourage concentration, and I'd be interested in trying them out. He envisions a future in opposition to William Gibson's - instead of a future of over-stimulated citizens living everywhere but nowhere, Johnson suggests that video games that encourage attention could become a "... Walkman for the early 21st century. A Walkman that makes you faster, sharper, more in control. Assuming of course that faster, sharper, more in control is what you want." Quite frankly, this sounds boring to me, I love my morning espresso. Ironically, he cites mentral control of Quake as an example of what brain outputs currently are not capable of.
My first college counselor, who had been one auto-assigned to me by the Oberlin computers, recommended that I go into neuroscience since I had a few credits to burn. She pitched it to me as a mix between Biology and Computer Science, a field that was going absolutely to boom as dramatically as the technology industry had. I quickly dropped her for a CS professor, but now I think maybe she was onto something.
I'm can't vouch for Steven Johnson's understanding of the scientific principles he describes, since I have no one to compare him with. I'm also wary of positing the responsibility of human instincts down into individual sections of the brain - behavior modification surgery (neo-Operation Ivy) can only be so far behind. I'd also like to read an Animal Rights' activists critique of the brain surgery done on rats - surely this is not as conclusive as Johnson makes it out to be.
I wish I knew more about the science behind the brain, and Mind Wide Open seems like a good gateway into this field of study. I'm so happy this book is good, I really hated the last book I read and I had to get that awful taste out of my head -the same thing happens to me with films and issues of The New Yorker. At least now I have a little more insight as to why.
Recent Comments