One Blogosipher's Help Ticket
When do my weblogs running 2.6 expire?
How much does TypeKey cost? Is there a subscription available?
Where are the permanently archived versions of older releases?
Where do you get these crazy ideas about "non-free" software?
Since there are 11 different XML formats all calling themselves "RSS," I anticipate problems exporting between different CMS packages. Shouldn't there be one format that everyone can standardize on? Are you working on that?
If yes, how much does that standard cost?
Why do you hate us?
Suppose I want my money back for the 25,000+ lines of code you've been giving away for free. What is the refund process like?
Posted by: dj | May 13, 2004 at 06:46 PM
gimme a break dj, this isn't about free.
It's about going from free to OUTRAGEOUSLY expensive.
99.9% of every negative comment I've seen - and there are A LOT - say they don't mind paying for MT. The issue is going from free to in most cases $149.
That's ridiculous, and I can't fathom why they did it.
Posted by: forrest | May 13, 2004 at 11:22 PM
sarcasm off now.
forrest, they didn't go from free to $149. They released a new product! They can set that price wherever they want. For the support and the features, it's a total bargain. Should Microsoft never be allowed to release a product for more than $49, since that's what the original DOS sold for?
This whole affair is the "echo chamber" at it's worst. "Everyone" is reading metafilter and deciding that "everyone" else is mad/unhappy.
If people really want blogging as a business and cultural enterprise to take the next level, businesses who create blog tools have got to start charging what the tools are worth.
Posted by: dj | May 13, 2004 at 11:50 PM
But the fact is that there have not been any substantial changes to the software. MT 3.0 is a maintenance release. It is not a new product.
It should also be considered that it is better to have 20 people willing to pay $50 than to have five willing to pay $100.
Posted by: Tiffany | May 14, 2004 at 12:00 AM
Tiffany, take a look at the code - MT 3.0 is definitely an upgrade where it counts. If you don't read code, take my word for it (I have no financial interest in six apart). It's much more than a maintenance release!
Posted by: dj | May 14, 2004 at 12:04 AM
Isn't registration open at MetaFilter?
Posted by: adam | May 14, 2004 at 12:46 AM
I guess my point was that it appears the six apart is pricing their product in such a way that it will result in abandoning a huge percentage of the people who made them popular in the first place.
I have a personal site that I started before blogging took off, and I can't justify paying that type of money for a blog at the same time that I'm paying for my host. That said, I don't want to use TypePad, since I have my own site. So basically, I'm stuck with software that will never get upgraded or I have to abandon my site.
I do find it interesting that it's named Developer Edition. Is it possible that there's a non-developer edition for folks like us?
Posted by: forrest | May 14, 2004 at 01:24 AM
So what if a load of people who'd paid precisely zero to Six Apart stop using their product? How much less income does that give them?
They'll have worked this out such that 95% of users continue to pay them nothing, either via using MT 2.6, moving to something else, or doing hooky things with MT 3. The people that matter from a business perspective are the other 5%: they are the company's customers, not a bunch of people who've invested nothing in the company.
Harsh, but true.
Posted by: Ian Betteridge | May 14, 2004 at 08:23 AM
Dave Winer gets a gold star.
Posted by: dj | May 14, 2004 at 12:10 PM
Posted by: dj | May 14, 2004 at 12:12 PM
At the $600 price point, the industrial use of MT is now a direct competitor with Manila - someone should do a feature comparison!
Posted by: xian | May 14, 2004 at 04:05 PM
i think most of the people that are angry about the new licensing options just are really bad bloggers and have nothing to write about. they view this chance to be "angry" as really interesting blogging fodder. "look at me! i can get emotional about important things!"
i bet they're really good in bed.
Posted by: yi | May 16, 2004 at 02:34 AM
Sign up online to Bet on Sports...bet on basketball sports betting
Posted by: basketball betting | January 17, 2005 at 09:19 PM